The Sierra Club


Site Planning for the new Ann Arbor High School:
Sierra Club calls for sensitivity to environmental features

In June of this year, voters in the Ann Arbor school district approved a millage that allows, among other things, the construction of a new high school. The Huron Valley Group of the Sierra Club did not take a position either in support of or in opposition to this millage. However, we are concerned about the environmental impact of the planned high school at the proposed site on Maple Road.

The site includes environmentally sensitive areas, including a pond, wetlands, and woodlands. Site plan decisions will determine the extent to which these features are preserved. Moreover, the Board of Education is operating under a tight time frame in order to meet its objective of opening the new school in 2007, and there is concern that this may lead to shortchanging the opportunity for public input into the decision making process.

To express these concerns, we have sent letters and emails to the the Superintendent of Schools and to the seven members of the Board of Education, and we have met with school and city representatives.
Letter - September 9, 2004
Email - October 6, 2004
Email - April 25, 2005


Sierra Club Huron Valley Group, Mackinac Chapter
2300 Brockman Blvd.
Ann Arbor, MI 48104

September 9, 2004


Dr. George Fornero, Superintendent of Schools
2555 S. State St.
Ann Arbor MI 48104

Dear Dr. Fornero:

I am writing on behalf of 3800 Sierra Club members in the Ann Arbor area to express our concern about the process by which decisions will be made with respect to the site plan for the new high school.

As you are well aware, the intended location of the new high school has important environmental features that could easily be endangered or destroyed if proper attention and priority are not given to their preservation. As you also are well aware, the preservation of our environmental resources is a high priority, not just to members of the Sierra Club and other conservation-oriented groups, but to a large majority of the citizens in this area. Moreover, we place high priority on instilling respect for the environment in our children, and believe that it is important for our schools to reinforce that respect not only through classes and activities, but also by setting a stellar example of environmental sensitivity in practice.

For this reason, we urge four things: First, that the public be fully involved in the process of making decisions about the site plan for the new high school. Second, that comprehensive information about the site and its sensitive environmental features be made freely available to the public. These sensitive environmental features include the pond, the wetland areas, and woodlands, especially the oak/hickory woodlot. Third, that the fullest possible protection be provided to these sensitive environmental features. And finally, that there be a full disclosure of the basis for all site plan decisions that have relevance to the preservation of these sensitive environmental features.

The Sierra Club is committed to monitoring the development of the site plan with respect to the four items outlined above. We look forward to the development of a high school site of which we can all be proud.

Yours truly,
Bill Rodgers
Co-Chair, Conservation Team

Back to top of page


Followup email, October 6, 2004
Subject: Preservation of sensitive environmental features of proposed site for the new high school


Dear Superintendent Fornero and Trustees of the Board of Education:

This e-mail is a follow-up to a letter that I wrote on behalf of the 3800 Sierra Club members in the Ann Arbor area and that I mailed to each of you on September 9; and to comments that I made during the public commentary period at the Board meeting on September 22. In the letter and in my remarks, I urged that, if you decide to build the new high school at the proposed site on Maple Road, steps be taken to preserve sensitive environmental features of that site. I have not gotten any direct response to my letters or comments, but I was disappointed to observe that the revised site plan, as presented to the Board on September 22, actually went in the opposite direction by reducing the amount of the oak/hickory woodlot that would be preserved.

We have, however, heard reassurances from some of you that you place high priority on preserving as much as possible of the sensitive environmental features of the site. If you are indeed serious about this, then I urge that you consider taking a tangible step to preserve these features in perpetuity. Otherwise, I fear that, whatever your intentions, a future board will violate your stated intentions by allowing development to encroach further onto the woodlots or wetlands.

Specifically, the Sierra Club urges that you take one of the following steps with respect to the oak/hickory woodlot in the north central part of the site; the sugar maple woodlot in the southeast corner of the lot; the wetlands in the southwest and south central parts of the site; and the relocated frog pond: either 1) transfer ownership of these portions of the site to the Ann Arbor Park system with the stipulation that they be permanently preserved; or 2) place a conservation easement on these portions of the site.

Both of these options would assure the public that the Ann Arbor public schools are committed to preserving at least a portion of the site from development. They would also assure the preservation of natural areas that would be valuable as study sites for biology and ecology classes as well as a favorite place for students and teachers to find an oasis of tranquility.

Speaking unofficially as a member of the Ann Arbor Park Advisory Commission, I would welcome the opportunity for a discussion of these options that would include Superintendent Fornero, members of the school board, and members of PAC. For this reason, I am cc'ing members of PAC on this message.

Sincerely,
Bill Rodgers
Co-Chair, Conservation Team, Huron Valley Group of the Sierra Club
2300 Brockman Blvd.
Ann Arbor, MI 48104
734-769-0163

Back to top of page


Followup email, April 25, 2005
Subject: Sierra Club's concerns about the new high school site

Dear Superintendent Fornero and Trustees of the Board of Education:

I am writing you on behalf of the 3800 Sierra Club members in the Ann Arbor area to express our concern about how you are handling the possible loss of high quality natural features at the site for the new high school.

I wrote to you last fall to urge that you take action that would insure the permanent preservation of woodlots, wetlands, and a pond at the site. In January of this year I met with a group that included Randy Trent, Bill Browning, and Karla Henderson. At that meeting I was given assurances that the School District is committed to following sound environmental principles at this site as it is at all school sites. However, I was told that the steps I had urged (conservation easements or giving the environmentally sensitive areas to the Ann Arbor park system) would not be considered.

This is disappointing. I hope you will reconsider your decision so that the environmental values you have espoused are put into practical action.

The recent discovery of an endangered species on the new high school site adds to our concerns about your development plans. It is my understanding that during an amphibian rescue operation conducted by David Mifsud, a herpetologist with the Natural Area Preservation group employed by the City of Ann Arbor, and volunteer citizens, among the animals collected were the Ambystoma texanum (Smallmouth salamander), a species that is on the Endangered Species list for the State of Michigan. This species was found in the area of the "frog pond" - a seasonal pond that is considered by herpetologists to be a high quality breeding site for amphibians.

Unfortunately, a large proportion of such ponds that formerly existed in Michigan have been lost to developments and other disturbances. Your present plan calls for destruction of the frog pond and the construction of another pond at a different location. However, the weak track record for such efforts indicates that success is very much in doubt. For example, my understanding is that only part of the life cycle of amphibians is spent in water - the rest of the year the Ambystoma texanum lives underground, perhaps at some distance from the pond. Would enough of the habitat surrounding the frog pond be successfully replicated at the site of the new pond? Would the animals be able to find their way to the new pond?

In any event, this project will require utmost care, a considerable amount of time before the new pond has a realistic chance to become a suitable habitat, and many years of monitoring.

The identification of an endangered species is of deep concern to the Sierra Club, not just because this particular species might be lost at this site, but also because this discovery is an indicator that the pond and its surrounding area are likely to be rich wildlife habitats containing many valuable species. The Sierra Club would like to see an assessment by an independent expert - one not selected by AAPS - who would be commissioned to examine the overall site, and the area around the frog pond in particular, to determine if other endangered species have been missed in your previous effort to assess the site.

Replacing a high quality aquatic habitat such as the frog pond with an artificial pond in a new location typically results in a lower quality habitat, and in the loss of biological diversity. Most such artificial wetlands and ponds fail, regardless of the goodwill or intent or investment. It is a far better practice to preserve significant and fragile natural features like the frog pond than to try to re-create them.

The Sierra Club requests that you do three things so that you are acting responsibly regarding the natural features of the high school site:

* First, we request that you reverse your decision not to protect the most environmentally sensitive portions of the site by placing conservation easements on them, or through donating them to the Ann Arbor parks system.

* Second, we request that you publicly release the complete details of your plan to mitigate the loss of wildlife habitat and wetlands so that it can be independently determined whether this plan meets science-based standards.

* Third, we request that you commission an independent assessment of the biological and ecological significance of the site as a whole, with special focus on the frog pond area. If our concerns are confirmed, the Sierra Club believes you should reconfigure your site plan so that the pond and the other environmentally sensitive areas are adequately safeguarded.

The Sierra Club believes that you owe these three actions to the citizens of Ann Arbor, to the plant and animal species found in the area, and most of all to the students who will, one way or the other, be taught an important lesson about their environment, and the value placed on that environment by their schools.

Sincerely,
Bill Rodgers
Co-Chair, Conservation Team, Huron Valley Group of the Sierra Club
2300 Brockman Blvd.
Ann Arbor, MI 48104
734-769-0163

Back to top of page


Last updated by Suzanne Brucker Heiney, May 2005.